Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1357

reference
300-tree-1
name
1357
tree-preservation-order

undefined

300-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.027017 50.893489)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.026974 50.893484,-1.026976 50.893493,-1.026982 50.893500,-1.026991 50.893506,-1.027003 50.893510,-1.027016 50.893512,-1.027030 50.893511,-1.027042 50.893507,-1.027051 50.893501,-1.027057 50.893494,-1.027060 50.893485,-1.027058 50.893477,-1.027052 50.893469,-1.027042 50.893463,-1.027031 50.893459,-1.027017 50.893458,-1.027004 50.893459,-1.026992 50.893463,-1.026983 50.893469,-1.026977 50.893476,-1.026974 50.893484)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL